What to Do With Syria • Electoral Badgering in the Badger State

A Course for Controlled Conflict

The executions of more than 100 people in Houla and Deir al-Zour last month confirm what we already knew: Syria’s Sunnis and Alawites are in a civil war. President Bashar al-Assad’s claim that terrorists conducted the slaughter of fellow Sunnis to create an international outcry is laughable. The evidence gleaned by a United Nations effort led by Kofi Annan suggests the Alawite Shabiha militia, working in tandem with the government military, was responsible.

Pressure is rising for the Obama administration and its European, Sunni Arab, and Turkish allies to act. Suggestions range from arming Syria’s opposition (Mitt Romney) to launching Libya-style airstrikes (Republican Senator John McCain) to creating safe zones (Democratic Senator John Kerry). None have explained how they would control the aftermath of a successful intervention that the U.S. and its allies would then own. Nor have they explained what part of the fragmented opposition forces they would arm and coordinate with, or how to avoid widening the conflict to a regional Sunni-Shiite contest.

Yet as frustration and horror at events in Syria grow each day, every remaining step toward isolation of the regime, its military, and its finances should be taken without delay. Indictment for war crimes for all implicated in directing the killings should be threatened — though not yet implemented, leaving open a road to exile for Assad and his henchmen. Prosecution can follow later.

To maximize pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin, China, and the Syrian regime, the U.S. administration should order the Pentagon to present options for eventual military action alongside allies such as Turkey and the Gulf Arab nations. In the meantime, the U.S. and others should use all means short of military ones, from jamming broadcast signals to cyberwarfare, to obstruct Syrian forces. The public warning on May 30 from Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the UN, that the U.S. and others may soon circumvent Russia’s veto at the Security Council is welcome additional pressure. Another Libya- or Kosovo-style action by U.S.-led forces is what Russia most wants to prevent in Syria.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle and Burhan Ghalioun, leader of the opposition Syrian National Council, have made clear over the past few days their belief that Russia’s strategic interests in Syria should be safeguarded in a post-Assad world. This will be the cost of Russian cooperation. In his visits to Berlin and Paris over the weekend, Putin showed little sign of bending. He continued to insist on Russia’s neutrality in the dispute (despite its arms shipments to the Syrian government), and on the need for a patient negotiated solution (even though it’s clear that path is closed as long as Assad thinks he can survive militarily).

As he begins his second, less popular tour as Russian president, Putin has to decide whether being cast as defender of a Syrian regime that executes children advances his interests. Russia, after all, invaded its neighbor Georgia for allegedly committing far lesser crimes.

Wisconsin’s Waste of Time

The recall is finally over. Who won? Political consultants, TV and radio stations flush with unexpected ad revenue, out-of-state conservative political advocates, and perhaps, future state budgets. As for losers, there’s Wisconsin taxpayers (out at least $16 million in election costs), public employee unions, out-of-state liberal political advocates, and you know, the spirit of democracy.

The actual candidates — Republican Governor Scott Walker and Democratic Mayor Tom Barrett of Milwaukee — will go back to the jobs they’ve had since Walker defeated Barrett the first time around, in November 2010. The difference is that they return exhausted and distracted, tarred by scandal, facing a shortened timeline in which to accomplish anything of substance before the next election cycle.

Recall elections have their place: generally, in cases of serious breaches of the public faith or morality, or of extreme incompetence. The effort to recall Walker, however, stemmed from a political disagreement over his support for a law that, among other things, limited the collective bargaining rights of public-sector employees. It’s vital that state employees make a more reasonable contribution to their health-care plans. Yet since 2009, 42 other states have enacted some sort of pension reform without laws like Wisconsin’s.

Still, the law was a legitimate act of democratic politics. State Democrats, union leaders, and their supporters should have set their minds to building public support for statehouse elections and the 2014 race for governor. Instead, they threw a yearlong temper tantrum. Now $63 million has been spent — most by groups from outside the state — in an ultimately futile attempt to take back an honest election.

Here’s the telling detail: In all the tumult, the collective bargaining law became an afterthought. Polls show the majority of Wisconsinites support limiting collective bargaining. Barrett barely mentioned the law in the campaign’s final weeks. What started out as an election focused on union rights turned into a referendum on Walker’s promise to create a quarter-million jobs by 2014. Barrett jumped on federal data showing a loss of 21,400 nonfarm positions during the past year. Although Walker’s numbers are probably more accurate, a governor has almost no control over these sorts of short-term economic trends.

The Wisconsin vote, we are told, will be an augury of the presidential election in November. If so, President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney won’t have a hard time deciphering the entrails: It’s all about jobs.

To read Mark Buchanan on testosterone and market behavior and A. Gary Shilling on hope for the yen, go to: Bloomberg.com/view

Welcome!

Magazines Review offers you a broad range of popular American magazines online. Browse an extensive directory of magazines, covering most important aspects of your life. Find the most recent issues of your favourite magazine, or check out the oldest ones.

About content

All the articles are taken from the official magazine websites and other open web resources.

Please send your complains and suggestions through our feedback form. Thank you.