All in the family

Peter Freeman explains why you might borrow from a fund member

Peter Freeman

MICHEL STREICH

WHEN THE TRUSTEES OF A self-managed super fund embrace “limited recourse borrowing”, a strategy available to SMSFs since late 2007, they usually get the loan from a mainstream lender. Generally this makes good sense but, as Scott Quinn, the technical manager with ANZ subsidiary OnePath, explains, it is sometimes sensible to get the loan from a member of the fund. This avoids the need to comply with the sometimes costly conditions imposed by some lenders, including the possible need to rewrite the fund’s trust deed to satisfy the lender’s requirements.

Quinn says that, in some cases, the initial motivation when a member makes a loan to an SMSF is not so much to avoid dealing with mainstream lenders, but rather simply the desire of a member to lend to the fund.

There are a number of reasons why this might be a sensible strategy. One is that the SMSF will pay less tax on any earnings it makes from investing the money it borrows. Realising capital gains can even be postponed until fund members are in the tax-free pension phase. Some members may want to lend to their SMSF because they are close to or at their contribution caps for the financial year. Others can no longer contribute because they are 65 or older and no longer satisfy the relevant work test.

There is also the situation where the members of an SMSF want to build up the fund without losing access to the extra money invested. In contrast to contributions, which usually can’t be withdrawn until you retire, your SMSF has the right to repay its borrowings at any time.

While this is technically correct, Quinn stresses that trustees have to act solely in the interest of fund members in building up their retirement savings. Selling assets and repaying a loan may conflict with this obligation.

The ability to lend to your SMSF may be due to the fact you are wealthy; others may have received an inheritance, while still others may have sold a property, perhaps because they have traded down to a smaller, cheaper home.

Money can also be generated by taking out a loan against your home or other assets, although, as Quinn cautions, the tax deductibility of the interest you are charged on the loan can get complicated.

But whatever your motive and source of funds, it is crucial to pay close attention to two issues: the structure of the loan and the interest rate you charge your fund.

As Quinn explains, you have to use the same structure required for a standard loan to an SMSF. This means it has to be a formal limited recourse borrowing arrangement, which can cost between $2000 and $5000 to set up.

As for the interest rate, while the superannuation rules prevent you charging your SMSF an above-market rate, tax office Interpretative Decision 2010/162 suggests it may be possible to charge a below-market rate, possibly even zero.

But charging zero interest may prompt tax office queries. As well, there has been some speculation that the government may make it mandatory to charge a market rate of interest.

Peter Freeman is a former managing editor of The Australian Financial Review and edited its Smart Money section.

Welcome!

Magazines Review offers you a broad range of popular American magazines online. Browse an extensive directory of magazines, covering most important aspects of your life. Find the most recent issues of your favourite magazine, or check out the oldest ones.

About content

All the articles are taken from the official magazine websites and other open web resources.

Please send your complains and suggestions through our feedback form. Thank you.